PEPPOL vs XRechnung — Millist e-arve formaati kasutada?

Nii PEPPOL BIS 3.0 kui XRechnung põhinevad EN 16931 ja UBL 2.1-l, kuid teenivad erinevaid eesmärke.

Olulised erinevused

PEPPOL BIS 3.0

UBL 2.1 arve formaat + transpordi võrgustik. Kasutusel piiriülesteks EL B2B ja B2G arveteks.

XRechnung 3.x

Saksa B2G CIUS EN 16931-st. Rangem kui PEPPOL täiendavate kohustuslike väljadega.

Kas need on ühilduvad?

XRechnung võib reisida PEPPOL kaudu

XRechnung UBL arved on struktuuriliselt kehtivad PEPPOL-iga ühilduvad dokumendid.

XRechnung on rangem kui PEPPOL

Kehtiv XRechnung arve on alati kehtiv EN 16931 arve. aiDoks genereerib XRechnung-i nii UBL kui CII süntaksis.

Mis on Saksa B2B kohustusega?

Saksa B2B e-arve kohustuse jaoks ei ole XRechnung nõutav formaat — see on B2G-spetsiifiline.

PEPPOL vs XRechnung: KKK

What is the difference between PEPPOL and XRechnung?

PEPPOL (Pan-European Public Procurement Online) is a cross-border transport network plus a set of format specifications. PEPPOL BIS Billing 3.0 is the PEPPOL invoice format, based on UBL 2.1 + EN 16931. XRechnung is the German B2G Core Invoice Usage Specification (CIUS) of EN 16931 — a stricter subset of EN 16931 with additional mandatory fields (Leitweg-ID, specific VAT formats). XRechnung is a format; PEPPOL is both a network and a format.

Can XRechnung invoices be transported over the PEPPOL network?

Yes. XRechnung UBL invoices are fully PEPPOL-compatible — they carry the XRechnung CustomizationID URN but otherwise conform to PEPPOL's UBL 2.1 structure. German federal and state portals accept XRechnung delivered via a PEPPOL access point. Many PEPPOL access points (Basware, Storecove, OpenPEPPOL partners) support XRechnung delivery as a standard service.

Which format should I use for invoices to German public authorities?

Use XRechnung. German B2G is explicitly the XRechnung use case. You also need the Leitweg-ID assigned by the buyer, which PEPPOL BIS invoices do not require. If your software generates PEPPOL BIS 3.0 invoices, switching to XRechnung typically means changing the CustomizationID and adding the BuyerReference (Leitweg-ID) — aiDoks handles both profiles from the same form.

Is PEPPOL used in Germany for B2B invoicing?

Yes, PEPPOL is growing in German B2B, particularly in supply-chain-intensive industries (automotive, retail). The German B2B e-invoicing mandate from 2025/2027 accepts EN 16931-compliant structured invoices in multiple formats: UBL, CII, or ZUGFeRD/Factur-X hybrid. PEPPOL BIS 3.0 UBL qualifies. XRechnung is not typically used for B2B — it is a B2G-specific format.

Is one format stricter than the other?

XRechnung is stricter than PEPPOL BIS 3.0. XRechnung adds BR-DE-* rules on top of EN 16931 (for example: mandatory Leitweg-ID, mandatory seller electronic address, German-specific VAT number formats). A valid XRechnung invoice is always a valid EN 16931 invoice, but a valid PEPPOL BIS 3.0 invoice may not pass XRechnung validation (because the Leitweg-ID and seller endpoint rules may not be satisfied).

Can aiDoks validate and generate both formats?

Yes. The aiDoks validator auto-detects whether an invoice is PEPPOL BIS 3.0 or XRechnung from the CustomizationID URN and applies the correct rule pipeline. The generator supports both profiles from the same form — switch between PEPPOL and XRechnung with the output profile selector. For XRechnung, the form additionally reveals the Buyer Reference (Leitweg-ID) field.

Valideeri PEPPOL või XRechnung — tasuta

Tuvastab automaatselt formaadi CustomizationID-st.